Florida Court Explains Factors Considered in Reviewing Sentences

Hanlon Law, PA — Fri, 05 Apr 2024 15:42:43 +0000

People accused of sex crimes will, at times, determine that it is best to enter a guilty plea in hopes of receiving a reduced sentence. In some cases, though, the courts will enter a greater sentence than the defendants anticipate. In such instances, the defendant may be able to appeal the sentence issued, but if they cannot demonstrate that the court committed an error, their appeal will likely be denied, as shown in a recent Florida case. If you are accused of a sex crime, it is prudent to consult a Clearwater sex crime lawyer regarding your rights.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is alleged that the defendant was charged with using a minor to produce child pornography, distributing child pornography, and possessing child pornography. The charges stemmed from an incident in October 2021, in which an online FBI employee received messages containing child pornography from an individual later identified as the defendant. Subsequent investigations revealed the defendant involvement in the production, distribution, and possession of child pornography, including images and videos of his daughter.

Reportedly, a search of the defendant’s residence uncovered evidence supporting the charges. The defendant pled guilty to all counts without objection and faced an advisory guidelines sentence of life imprisonment. At sentencing, the defendant did not contest the PSR’s recommendation. The district court considered various factors, including the defendant’s military service, and sentenced him to 840 months. He then appealed.

Factors Considered in Reviewing Sentences

On appeal, the defendant argued that the trial court made two errors. First, the defendant asserted that the court incorrectly applied a sentencing enhancement based on a pattern of activity, citing that only two or three images involving the same victim at a similar time were used. Second, he contended that his military service should have been viewed as a mitigating factor in his sentence rather than an aggravating one. The court ultimately rejected his arguments and affirmed his sentence.

The court applied a two-step process to review the defendant’s sentence. First, they assessed the procedural soundness of the court’s process and found no significant errors. The defendant’s failure to object at sentencing prompted the court to conduct a review for plain error, which the defendant could not establish. As such, the court affirmed the district court’s application of the pattern-of-activity enhancement and its consideration of The defendant’s military service.

Second, the court examined the substantive reasonableness of the sentence and determined the defendant’s sentence fell within the reasonable range. Despite the defendant’s contention that his sentence was excessive, the court upheld it based on the severity of his crimes. They emphasized the egregious nature of child sex offenses and noted previous rulings supporting lengthy sentences for similar crimes. The defendant’s argument that a lesser sentence would be more appropriate did not sway the court, which found the court’s decision reasonable given the facts and circumstances. Thus, the court affirmed the defendant’s sentence, concluding that neither procedural nor substantive errors warranted reversal.

Meet with an Experienced Clearwater Attorney

Sex crimes typically carry significant sentences, especially when they involve children, but there are often arguments people accused of sex offenses can assert to avoid a conviction. If you are accused of a sex crime, it is in your best interest to meet with an attorney. The Clearwater sex crime defense attorneys of Hanlon Law can assess your case and aid you in pursuing the best legal result possible. You can contact Hanlon Law by using our online form or by calling us at 727-897-5413 to arrange a meeting.

The post Florida Court Explains Factors Considered in Reviewing Sentences appeared first on Clearwater Criminal Lawyer Blog.

Florida Court Discusses Double-Jeopardy in Sex Crime Cases

Hanlon Law, PA — Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:03:43 +0000

It is well-known that there is a constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy, which is the term used for being tried or convicted more than once for the same criminal offense. This does not mean that a person cannot face multiple criminal charges for criminal conduct in a single criminal episode, however, as recently discussed by a Florida appellate court, in a case in which the defendant was convicted of both attempted lewd battery and unlawfully traveling to meet a minor. If you are a Clearwater resident faced with charges of a sex crime involving a minor or any other sex crime it is essential to retain an assertive Clearwater sex crime defense attorney to fight to protect your liberties.

Facts and Procedural Background

Allegedly, in June 2016, the defendant communicated online with an undercover police officer who was posing as a fourteen-year-old girl. During their conversations, the defendant offered to pay the girl money for sexual activity and arranged to meet the girl at her house. On the way to the agreed upon location, which the defendant believed to be the girl’s home, the defendant reportedly stopped to get cash and buy condoms. When he arrived at the home, he was arrested. He was subsequently charged with unlawful travel and attempted lewd battery.

It is reported the defendant moved to dismiss the attempted lewd battery charge, on double jeopardy grounds. The court ruled that although both crimes arose out of the same conduct, and a single criminal episode, it found that each charge required elements of proof that the other did not. The trial court denied the defendant’s motion and he pleaded no contest to the charges. He then appealed from the final judgment.

Double Jeopardy Analysis

The prohibition against double jeopardy set forth in the United States Constitution does not prevent multiple punishments for separate offenses arising out of the same criminal episode if the legislature intended to permit separate punishments. Where there is no clear legislative intent, however, the court must analyze whether each crime charged contains elements that must be proven that are not part of the other crimes charged.

In conducting such an analysis, the court looks to the elements of the crime rather than the facts. In the subject case, the court noted that there was a clear difference between the elements of each crime. Specifically, unlawful travel required, in part, proof that the child victim was less than eighteen years old. Conversely, attempted lewd battery required proof that the intended victim was at least twelve but less than sixteen years old. Thus, the court found that attempted lewd battery contained elements that unlawful travel did not. As such, the court found the crimes were two separate offenses that should be punished separately, and the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

Consult a Knowledgeable Attorney Regarding Your Case

Criminal defendants have numerous rights, including the right against double jeopardy. If you are a Clearwater resident charged with one or more sex crimes it is essential to your defense to retain a knowledgeable Clearwater sex crime defense attorney who will vigorously fight on your behalf. Attorney William Hanlon of Hanlon Law is a seasoned criminal defense attorney who will work diligently to help you seek the best legal result available under the facts of your case. You can reach Mr. Hanlon at 727-897-5413 or via the form online to set up a meeting to discuss your case.

The post Florida Court Discusses Double-Jeopardy in Sex Crime Cases appeared first on Clearwater Criminal Lawyer Blog.

Computer Sex Crimes Category Archives — Clearwater Criminal Lawyer Blog Published by Florida Defense Lawyer — Hanlon Law